Bodies of Knowledge

All through the 1970s and ’80s, girls argued that except they gained access to information about their very own our bodies, there would be no equality. In Bodies of knowledge, Wendy Kline considers the methods in which unusual girls labored to place the female physique at the middle of women’s liberation. As Kline shows, the struggle to achieve this knowledge unified girls but in addition divided them-according to race, class, sexuality, or stage of professionalization. Each of the 5 chapters of Our bodies of knowledge examines a distinct second or setting of the women’s movement in order to give life to the ideas, expectations, and pitfalls encountered by the advocates of women’s health: the making of Our Our bodies, Ourselves (1973); the conflicts surrounding the training and observe of women’s pelvic exams; the emergence of abortion as a feminist problem; the battles over contraceptive regulation on the 1983 Depo-Provera FDA hearings; and the rise of the occupation of midwifery. Including an epilogue that considers the experiences of the daughters of 1970s feminists, Bodies of data is a vital contribution to the research of the bodies-that marked the lives-of feminism’s second wave.

It ran for 63 performances from February 12, 1964, to April 5, 1964. It featured Karin Wolfe (Jo), Susan Browning (Meg), Judith McCauley (Beth), April Shawhan (Amy), Don Stewart (Laurie), Joy Hodges (Marmee), Lowell Harris (John Brooke) and Mimi Randolph (Aunt March). A radio play starring Katharine Hepburn as Jo was made to accompany the 1933 movie. Grand Audiobooks hold the current copyright. The novel has impressed quite a few other literary retellings by numerous authors. Longest, David (1998). Little Girls of Orchard House: A Full-size Play. Sparknotes: literature. Spark Academic Publishing. Alberghene, Janice (1999). "Autobiography and the Boundaries of Interpretation on Reading Little Women and the Dwelling is easy". In Alberghene, Janice M.; Clark, Beverly Lyon (eds.). Little Women and the Feminist Imagination: Criticism, Controversy, Personal Essays. Cheever, Susan (2011). Louisa Could Alcott: A personal Biography. Cullen Sizer, Lyde (2000). The Political Work of Northern Ladies Writers and the Civil Struggle, 1850-1872. Univ of North Carolina Press.

Individuals are irrational maximizers who need to earn money NOW, and frequently make the mistake of selling low and buying high. But for those who decide to the philosophy of HODL, you surrender your freedom (choices) to promote on the dip, and hopefully, make money over time. A part of why this strategy works is trading prices. Even when you would precisely predict the market, there’s a cost to continually changing your place. If you buy and promote your bitcoin by way of Coinbase, it's a must to quit 2-3% of the commerce quantity on each transaction. If two people had 1 bitcoin originally of the month, and one particular person HODL’d while the opposite bought it and re-purchased it every day, the primary person would find yourself with much more worth just by not paying the buying and selling prices. If the worth didn’t move in any respect, and we assume a 2% transaction cost, the primary person would nonetheless have 1 bitcoin while the second could be down to .54btc.

The fallacy is based on Herb Simon’s work on “satisficing.” Primarily, in situations the place the ideal alternative is unclear, we tend to pick the “good enough” option. It’s a manner for our not-so-rational brains to make choices in a world the place they might otherwise spend an infinite amount of time calculating excellent preferences. It’s why people who lose their emotional cores can’t make decisions.  penis enlargement sleeve  can’t satisfice. Somebody is a satisficer if they can default to the adequate possibility. They’re a maximizer if they want the very best option. Which camp you fall into will differ depending on how a lot you care about the world you’re making selections in, but we additionally are usually extra macro-satisficers or macro-maximizers. If you actually tried to maximise the whole lot, you’d by no means make any selections and be a neurotic mess. When you had been a perfect satisficer, your decisions can be immediate. Most of us are somewhere alongside the satisficing - maximizing spectrum. Certainly one of the largest influences on how a lot we tend in direction of maximization is the availability of options.